On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:15:54PM +0000, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 18:21:32 GMT, David Cantrell wrote:
> I do dislike having two line editing libraries, but whatever.
libreadline being full-fledged GPLv3+ makes it hard to justify in BSD
projects. For such a commonly used library, it being GPL rather than
LGPL makes little sense to me, but that's the way it is.
I understand the reason, but it's less of a technical reason and more just
a licensing annoyance. That's all I wanted to point out.
David Cantrell <dcantrell(a)redhat.com>
Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team
Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT