On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hey,
On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
> > I feel this is a better way to handle these issues
> > > than the bootstrapping option (which will be
> > > reverted from nfs-utils).
> I think I've addressed these.
>
> But we probably should do one last version bump in fedfs-utils and
> autofs to ensure everything still builds properly when it's
> reverted,
> correct?
>
I already verified both fedfs-utils and autofs build without nfs
-utils,
but nfs-utils is still required to install fedfs-client and fedfs
-server.
Looks like the compose went ok too, based on the mail I saw.
It makes sense for fedfs-utils-client and fedfs-utils-server to require
nfs-utils doesn't it?
Ian