On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:29:18AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm
> it'll be larger than gdm because it also has to be as functional as kdm.
> So I don't see any great benefit.
Which functions is it missing?
Approximately anything that's been implemented in gdm since 2003.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org