On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
It's more about not flooding the rawhide reports with a sea of
OCaml
broken dep emails. That decreases readability for others looking for
things they can fix. (Aside from the primary concern of just wanting
to get OCaml fixed too.)
Isn't it redundant for the rawhide report to show more than one broken
package dependency anyway? Certainly if the deps that are broken come
from the same package ...
Anyway, I'm rebuilding some now.
Rich.