On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:44:55 +0100
Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 25.09.2015 23:46, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 25.09.2015 22:44, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:40:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>
>> Well, then adding the i686 build to the mash x86_64 multilib
>> compose whitelist
>> cannot be avoided -- as it's needed to really fix #1068620.
> Okay thanks -
https://pagure.io/mash/issue/4.
Been a couple of weeks, is pagure being actively used for tracking
mash requests?
yes.
However:
1) There's some kind of big release releng is working on.
Something 23? It's taking up a lot of their time. ;)
2) I think there's a pagure issue here where PR's aren't notifying
people who can merge them. I didn't see any notice of this one...
Will try and file a ticket on that.
kevin