On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:02:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> That seems reasonable, and in that case, something like
"fedora-presets"
> and "fedora-workstation-presets", etc., seems appropriate, and the
> corresponding release package could pull them in.
What about my proposal to drop the preset directly onto the file system (but
in /etc rather than in /usr/share as we do now) in the live kickstarts?
After all, a file in /etc doesn't really need to be owned by some package.
(Having it unowned also means sysadmins can easily customize it by editing
it directly, as opposed to creating their own file in /etc.)
I think in most caess, it's actually _nicer_ to create your own overrides
file rather than editing a big monolith one, bceause with the monolithic
approach you have to deal with merging changes in areas you didn't care
about.
I'm also not in favor of adding _more_ "canonical voodoo" to kickstart
files
-- that is, stuff which is effectively mandatory in every %post section.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>