On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of
> %systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of
> %systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by default and honoring whatever
> presets are set for the spin.
>
> This approach allows for spec files to be synced between all Fedora
> branches and generate the appropriate scriptlets for each release when
> built.
This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final
state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain.
Once F20 rolls out and F17 goes EOL, maintainers can simply
s/systemd_post_enable/systemd_post/ and then things won't be so ugly (or
final).
--
Scott Schmit