Jesse Keating schrieb:
On Friday 20 April 2007 11:02:28 Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam(a)arcor.de> wrote:
>>> --- uqm.spec 27 Jan 2007 02:33:09 -0000 1.12
>>> +++ uqm.spec 20 Apr 2007 01:32:41 -0000 1.13
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>> Name: uqm
>>> Version: 0.6.2
>>> -Release: 1%{?dist}
>>> +Release: 1.1%{?dist}
>> Should have been
>>
>> Release: 1.%{?dist}.1
> Oh? News to me. Is that a new guideline?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-378ec5e6a73...
That section is titled "Minor release bumps for old branches" -- but
this was devel afaics.
BTW, I curios, too, why it should have been "1.%{?dist}.1" (and yes, I
fully understand that 1.%{?dist}.1 makes sense in old branches).
CU
thl