On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 19:37 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 28 February 2014 15:38, Tomas Mraz <tmraz(a)redhat.com>
> This should not break builds of any reasonably current software.
libgcrypt.so.11()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
I guess not much we can do there, other than maintain a compat package
-- right? :(
Since google-chrome-stable is not part of the distribution I do not see
why we should keep a compat package.
OTOH important libraries that still break soname instead of using symbol
versioning in 2014 really make me frown loudly...
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York