If any concerns about the autoconf2.69-2.69 compat package ? If needed it
can be implemented as non-parallelly instalable,
Thanks. Regards,
Ondrej
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 8:08 AM Ondrej Dubaj <odubaj(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks for your notes. If wanted, the first version of
autoconf2.69-2.69
compat package is available in copr for testing. This is a version which is
parallelly installable with autoconf-2.71. Please check/update your
packages and rebuild them.
Thanks. Regards,
Ondrej
copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/odubaj/autoconf-2.70/packages/
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 2:45 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > 1) Why 269 and not 2.69?
>
> I guess that this is a historical thing: past autoconf compatibility
> packages always had names such as autoconf213. Back then, dots in package
> names were considered unusual or harmful, standard practice was to omit
> them. The rule that the dot should be included was added relatively
> recently
> (but already a couple years ago by now) to the packaging guidelines.
>
> Kevin Kofler
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>