On 19 March 2014 19:23, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 19.03.2014 20:21, schrieb Jonathan Underwood:
> On 19 March 2014 19:16, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
>> but with not take care of it you would end in having firewalld as mandatory
>> dependency which is the main point of that thread - there are still way
>> too much circular dependencies making it hard to strip down a setup
>
> I didn't advocate having fail2ban having a hard Requires for
> firewalld, nor anything else creating a "circular dependence". I was
> simply advocating having a configuration file that would work for the
> most common case
and what installs that config file is the question and how
The main package.