Eric Springer (erikina(a)gmail.com) said:
> It's probably abusing the system and breaks a million
guidelines, but what
about making a "no-offensive-packages" package that explicitly conflicts
with a list of offensive packages?
I suspect the problem with that is attempting to determine a universal
concept of 'offensive'. Heck, we might have no-offensive-packages-kde
that conflicts with 'gnome-*', and no-offensive-packages-gnome...
Bill