On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Mathieu Bridon
<bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 15:14 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> 在 2013-3-12 PM3:03,"Tomasz Torcz" <tomek(a)pipebreaker.xn--pl>:-tu9k5577b
>
> > This sounds like updates that SHOULDN'T be pushed. If update has no
> > changes worth mentioning, it is trivial - trivial updates should not be
> pushed.
>
> If upstream release a minor bug fix version, what should we do?
>
>
> 在 2013-3-12 PM3:03,"Tomasz Torcz" <tomek(a)pipebreaker.xn--pl>:-tu9k5577b
>
> > This sounds like updates that SHOULDN'T be pushed. If update has
> no
> > changes worth mentioning, it is trivial - trivial updates should not
> be pushed.
>
> If upstream release a minor bug fix version, what should we do?
Then the update is not trivial, and you know what to put in the update
notes: just talk about this bug fix.
--
Mathieu
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Forget it. There is such a double standard here and exceptions to many
rules. This is a worthless conversation.
Good on ya if you put in the extra effort.
Dan