Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 04:02:41PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> Heh. Yeah, okay, fair point -- but currently it's the best we've got
>> (given that epylog seems stalled)...
> logwatch is for servers and system administrators; it is not
> appropriate for the desktop's general target audience.
That's only because it sucks. We need some way of properly communicating
this sort of status information to users.
+1 :-). I too would appreciate a condensed flavor of logwatch (delivered
somewhere more sensible). One that can combine all "unread" events (with
the option to drill down if desired) would be best.
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
"You know what Microsoft's problem really is? They've lost the ability
to feel ashamed." -- Pamela Jones (Groklaw)