On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 11:13 +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:46:18AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> well... if the root is brand spanking new.. why would it need a sync?
Because it _is_ brand spanking new (and thus unclean from a RAID point
of view)?
but.. it might as well be marked clean. there's no information in
never-used parts of the disk after all... so why sync it instead of
pretending it's synced perfectly fine....