On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> The kernel-source package became noarch. This had a LOT of
advantages,
> including cleanups, saves a TON of diskspace, it IS noarch, it saves a ton of
> build time too. It allows easier adding of other architectures as well.
Sorry but I don't follow. Why disk space or build time? Doesn't the
package have the same contents whether it is labeled i386 or noarch?
Now that Fedora Core supports more the x86, kernel source doesn't need to
be rebuilt for *every* arch, and every arch (that shares the same kernel
anyway) can also share the same noarch.rpm.
-- Rex