On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 15:38 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 13:49 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> I'll ask my question a different way I guess:
>>
>> Why does pm-utils/NM bring down the network for hibernate/suspend?
>
> Must have missed something here...
>
> Are you referring to the periodic problem where "Networking Enabled" is
> unchecked on resume? If so, that's covered by a pm-utils bug already,
> which is really a dbus bug that can be worked around in pm-utils.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477964
>
> If you're referring in general to "why does NM bring down the
network"
> on suspend, there are a few reasons for that which I can elaborate on.
Well, the problem I'm seeing on a machine with NFS home directories and
LDAP authentication is that after the network is brought down calls by
pm-utils to sync hang (presumably NFS related) and I see lots of
nss_ldap cannont connect to LDAP server errors and the hibernate process
hangs.
I suppose I should file a bug - against pm-utils for incorrect ordering
of scripts? Should I expect this to work?
Yeah, should probably get re-ordered. NM is at 55, should probably be
one of the last things to get poked.
Dan