On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:22:03AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Well, I see it as a well defined *targeted product* which happens to
> be composed of packages. It's the base from which other things can be
> installed from the Internet. What is the problem with "static pile of
> packages"? (I have to admit to only skimming this thread)
Updates to the previous release will quickly become N-V-R "newer" than
the static pile of packages, which renders your upgrade a bit... odd.
Why do we not force updates to Fedora X to always be N-V-R older than
Fedora X+1? We can use the Release tag to enforce this within a
Version, and newer Versions shouldn't appear in older Fedora's until
they've been in the newer Fedora first.