On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 15:54, Bill Anderson wrote:
Does this mean we can now stop requiring kerberos in everything that
can
have it required?
I would like to see more Kerberos support for Linux in general. I think
Kerberos is a blessing. Just imagine logging onto the network and being
able to ssh into any box, read your mail stored in a Cyrus-IMAPD server
without supplying a password, modifying your contacts stored into a
central LDAP server without supplying any credentials or DN, and so on.
Kerberos is deployed all over my boxes and I find it a pleasure to use,
although it can be a little tricky to set up. I would like to see far
better and wider support for it. Don't know how people can still live
with public keys and passwords when managing multiple servers.