Le lundi 01 mars 2010 à 15:16 -0800, Jesse Keating a écrit :
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 17:34 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too
> simplistic for real use cases. Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there
> should be:
>
> Fixes my problem
> Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
> problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system
> still works ok with the update)
> Doesn't fix my problem (but doesn't necessarily imply it's any worse
> than before)
> Causes new problems (which should, IMO, be an automatic veto of any push
> to stable, requiring intervention to override)
I agree that this is good data to have, and that karma right now is
pretty simplistic (which was it's goal). Simplistic karma is far better
than what we had before, which was nothing.
With enough data points one can print pretty graphes that show vote
repartition¹. Those are harder to skew than averages. However, they
require many data points and bohdi is far from that today
¹ For example, the bargraphs on
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=840
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=2276
(amazon uses a simpler system)
--
Nicolas Mailhot