David Lutterkort <dlutter <at> redhat.com> writes:
Anybody interested in Fedora Server should have a look at the
package
list and let me know if they think a package should be classified
differently; for the Maybe group, I'd appreciate comments on whether the
packages should be included or not (e.g., should FSS support dynamic DNS
and include the various clients for
dyndns.org etc. ?)
Would be great to put horde, imp and friends on the list too (i.e. webmail
essentials :-).
--
Bojan