On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:08:11 +0200
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Also, it means that not all of our package set has the
>> sha256 checksum, which is a checkbox item.
>
> Speaking of that, can RPM itself be built with SHA256 now that F11
> Beta is out? IMHO it doesn't make sense to still support upgrades
> (directly) from F11 Alpha.
Yeah, I agree. Panu?
Just did this for rawhide. Personally I couldn't care much less what
digests rpm package for a release X is using but if you want to break the
freeze for this then sure I can switch F11 rpm to default digests too.
- Panu -