2006/1/27, Dimi Paun <dimi(a)lattica.com>:
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 11:00 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>
> In what is it different from the quite mature ltsp project:
>
http://www.ltsp.org/ ?
It is not a separate distribution -- it runs the _exact_ same
software that's installed on the server. As such, it's simpler
to maintain, simpler to understand due to its familiarity
(if you run FC, like I do, you know it well, and I don't have
to learn a new distro), and in environments where distros must be
approved you don't have to push LTSP.
It's a minimalist take on LTSP, 100% based on Fedora/Red Hat.
Hence the post to this list :)
--
Dimi Paun <dimi(a)lattica.com>
Lattica, Inc.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Why not create a
sourceforge.net project for your approach?`even if it
maybe wont be the _one_ solution to kill all problems that go into
that direction and even if it might be obsoleted by stateless linux at
some point it time it could still be a simple solution that just works
for its specific task. just my opinion.
regards,
rudolf kastl