Hi Joachim,
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 18:57 +0200, Joachim Frieben wrote:
No, current "tetex-xdvi-3.0-26.1" does require
"libXm.so.4" as "rpm" reports:
"error: Failed dependencies:
libXm.so.4 is needed by tetex-xdvi-3.0-26.1.i386"
when trying to install it.
Try it again tomorrow with tetex-xdvi-3.0-27.fc6. I built it today so
it's not yet available on all mirrors.
>
> Indeed tetex-xdvi is now built with Xaw.
>
> Moving tetex to extras would be certainly nice, but many packages in
> core requires it to build (for documentation).
>
> --
> Pat
>
--
Jindrich Novy <jnovy(a)redhat.com>,
http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
(o_ _o)
//\ The worst evil in the world is refusal to think. //\
V_/_ _\_V