Enrico Scholz wrote:
>>>> But python or other bloaty scripting languages are
not a solution
>>>> and completely unacceptable at this place.
>>> "Bloaty" is something that could be solved, don't you think?
>> Not with python or perl.
> I've shown you the numbers. Why you still insist on it being bloated
Resulting scripts will be much longer. E.g. how much lines of python
code are required for
| sed '/^foo/s!/bin!/opt!' file | tac
Looks like one line in python to me if you write a sed and tac replacement into
your python library. (e.g. thats not about bash vs python at all...)
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul(a)gmail.com> <ajfarris(a)gmail.com>
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----