On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 16:23 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Because EPEL has to be very stable, so additional time spent in
testing is
even better, for example for reasons you highlight below. I never said
that packages should not go through testing in EPEL! But Fedora is another
thing.
The conclusion here is that it's OK for Fedora to be broken and unstable
in it's releases. I call bullshit. It is very much not OK for this to
happen.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/jkeating