-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2010 04:32 PM, Jerry James wrote:
It sounds like we should tell the Fedora Project Board that we are
forming, and appoint someone to send them regular status reports. We
should also tell the Packaging Committee that we have identified some
problems with the current Lisp packaging guidelines and plan to submit
revisions to those guidelines.
So according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Defining_projects it's
our turn to state missions goals now for a CL SIG, right? I've collected
all links mentioned so far at my talk page in the wiki [1] and suggest
we start off with finding common denominators and stick to the project
definition guide - we shouldn't declare anything premature to the board.
I'll try to contribute as much as possible depending on my spare time.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_talk:Akahl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAktK5ugACgkQVTRddCFHw11GTACeMA4fHBR4uCFKLO0mcPsSe/E5
nBwAn1F1BdHdKWgZxXf0JTY6EAkr6pjg
=mpq5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----