On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:05 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I wrote down the possible options and their pros and cons and I done
my best to catch all the feedback here.
Thanks.
Another idea occurred to me, similar to "D"
(use alternatives) and incorporates "A" (delete
the current epel-8) for their to be something such
as having a "mock-config-epel-default-base-rhel"
and "mock-config-epel-default-base-alma"
and "mock-config-epel-default-base-rocky" rpms
(or whatever the agreed upon names would be)
that would create the (raw?) epel-8 symlink, and
conflict with each other. Then one is left
discussing which of the various "Suggests: "
or "Enhances: " specifiers would be appropriate
and under what circumstances, perhaps such as
a Suggests: (....base-alma if alma-release), and
a Suggests: (...base-rocky if rocky-release) ???