On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 12:07 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/10/19 1:52 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Well it does work if you do
> >
> > dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-free,rpmfusion-nonfree download --
> > enablerepo=rawhide --source mercurial
> >
> > But that is not exactly obvious, so I think it's something dnf could
> > handle better (I hesitate to call it a bug).
>
> Wow, that is very non-obvious.
How is it non-obvious? --source enables the source repositories
corresponding to the binary repositories you have enabled, so if you don't
want it to enable rpmfusion-free-source, you have to disable the
rpmfusion-free (not rpmfusion-free-source) repository. Sounds quite obvious
to me.
But the user's intent is clear and the code almost certainly *could*
interpret it, it just doesn't right now. All it has to do is (re-
)consider the repo(s) that were disabled via user config *after* the
"infer the source repos to enable from the enabled binary repos" flow
has happened. I'd call it a bug, or at least a reasonable feature
request.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net