oddly this looks a lot like the Ubuntu release cycle if you replace stable
with LTS
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Jason Brooks <jbrooks(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/06/2012 10:55 AM, Matthieu Gautier wrote:
No, I never suggest that. Preview versions have a timelife of 6mo
> instead of 12.
> Stable version have a lifetime of 24mo (12mo for regular updates)
> instead of 12.
>
The cycle would have to go: stable, preview, preview, stable, and so on to
avoid maintaining more than two releases at a time.
If it went back and forth between stable and preview, you'd have three
supported releases at once in the second half of year two.
> Regards,
> Matthieu Gautier
>
>
>> How about NO?
>>
>>
https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.**net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/**
>>
tumblr_mbfshfloal1rpdotto1_**1280.jpg<https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/...
>>
>>
>
--
@jasonbrooks
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel<https://admin...