On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 17:46 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
What does that mean for distributions that don't use RPM?
rpm is part of lsb requirements is it not?
>> If it does, I don't see much advantage over having to build in every
>> distribution,version environment in the first place. And if not, then
>> how is it supposed to know about the dependencies you mentioned.
>
> The LSB specifies an lsb_release program that you can use to determine
> how LSB compliant the box is :
>
> [manu@orient ~]$ /usr/bin/lsb_release
> LSB Version: :core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch
Gak.. something that specifies locations by purpose wants an information
file in /usr/bin?
it's not a text file, it's an application that will check your level of
lsb.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/jkeating