Michal Schorm wrote:
We, as a distro, just take a different approach.
To be bleeding edge requires to have releases often.
That allow us to manage changes like GCC, OpenSSL and so on quickly.
Struggling with upstream who don't adapt, can't adapt or don't want to
adapt at the same speed. (And OpenSSL patch isn't something you'd want
to write for serveral pojects you maintain ...)
That is what make us different distro with its own user base. Want the
very same but LTS system? try CentOS. Or RHEL.
+1. LTS Fedora is what CentOS is for. Why should we not just point users who
want LTS to CentOS and EPEL?
Kevin Kofler