Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:00:53AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Matthew Booth wrote:
>
>> The separate updates directory has been a pain for as long as I've
>> been using RHL/Fedora Core/Fedora. It means you have two places to
>> look when searching for packages manually, and twice as much to
>> configure when you're configuring yum. It has never benefitted me, or
>> anybody I know, but it has caught me out on any number of occasions.
>> What's more, nobody really seems to know why it's like that: it seems
>> it's always been that way, and nobody ever bother to fix it.
>>
>> So lets fix it. The package set at release time is only interesting to
>> historians. If any of them are really that bothered, I'm sure somebody
>> can come up with a yum module which finds the oldest available version
>> of a package in a repo.
>>
>> Matt
>>
> Would not this also provide the minor added benefit that there could now
> be a drpm for the first update for a package?
>
We already have that if the update is done after GA.
josh
If that's the case, then good. In that case, I see no huge benefit to
leaving it or changing it.
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie