On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 12:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +0000, Chris Kelley wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a GitHub Action
> (
https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794
> 978022) that fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when
> using the rawhide docker image. I have been trying to keep up with
> the dnf/dnf5 revert story, but I may have missed something about
> the current state of affairs/expectations around it working without
> issue. I am not sure to whom I should raise this issue, any
> suggestions welcome - thanks!
Not sure what the specific issue is here, but in general, we
recommend
against pulling from the Docker registry, as it is not updated very
often. It's much better to pull from
registry.fedoraproject.org or
quay.io , as those are updated with every Rawhide compose.
Hi,
It seems that
https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora/tags/ is
quite outdated (contrary to
https://hub.docker.com/_/fedora ).
This is quite bad, if I run
podman run -ti fedora:39
it will get the image from
registry.fedoraproject.org (due to
/etc/containers/registries.conf). The problem is, that this image is
from August and still points to Rawhide. So the first `dnf upgrade`
installs fc40 packages, which results in a broken installation.
Workaround:
podman run -ti docker.io/fedora:39
Is this a known issue? Am I doing something wrong? Where would I report
this?
Thomas