On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 13:03, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:12:41AM +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> I think this is a problem that the rsh package is in normal RHEL8 (not
> sure in which stream) and if I am right, packages in rhel can not be in
> epel too.
When we get modularity up and working for EPEL-8, we'll need to figure out
how to handle that, as we want to be able to provide alternate versions as
non-default streams.
I hope so. I think the decisions are made by the PDC which is going to
be tricky.
On another note: rsh? Really? :)
Turns out some amount embedded hardware only works with rsh. The we
put it in 10 years ago and we aren't getting a new bridge anytime soon
so it works with what its got kind of hardware.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Stephen J Smoogen.