On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I can agree with that last sentence in parts. Please don't
forget the
order of incidents, however. First the early-warning system with hundreds
of messages and multiple threads, which made several packagers think "do
they want to ruin the community packaging project?", and several expressed
their criticism. *Afterwards* the more concrete proposals that ignored the
criticism and provoked further reactions from packagers, since it is only
natural that in project of volunteers that not everyone accepts the
inevitable. In return, the FESCo and FPB member quoted above has opted for
"an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" tactics. With an additional blog
entry. And another one attempted at public humiliation even.
Michael,
Do you really think you're attitude has been respectful and helpful
throughout all the time. Do you consider history at all?
You've generated a lot of bad blood and hostility over the years (as have
I). Do you think we all just forgot about it? You've used the "well, if
you aren't going to do it my way then I'll not play" option over and over
in my memory.
-sv