On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 27.09.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Neal Gompa:
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.09.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
>
> This is quite tiresome. dnf clearly isn't "completely
broken".
> It
> may have a bug, but the correct place to put that is in Bugzilla.
>
>
> a package manager which pretends "nothing to do" after rm -rf
> /var/cache/dnf/* while there are two fresh builds is by definition
> broken
>
> My question to you is... why are you doing "rm -rf /var/cache/dnf/*"?
> Why not just do "sudo dnf <action> --refresh"? That forces DNF to
> actually look at everything again. If your goal is to clean everything
> out, then "sudo dnf clean all" would do the trick too (which also worked
> in the yum days)
how often do you ask that question again?
a empty "/var/cache/yum|dnf" is a by definition and unconditional empty
cache - why should i trust a software obviously not working with the basic
commands right in case of other ones?
and BTW we are not a Ubuntu - what's up with all that "sudo" stuff - if i
am
root then i am root, that's it
This is unnecessarily combative and derogatory to a fellow
distribution, why are you going out of your way to be mean spirited?
Thanks,
Josef