On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 09:54 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 09:20 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I would be *extremely* reluctant to use something that big
> > that's
> > a) written in shell script (ugh) and b) has no tests.
>
> How did you figure the (b) part? The package itself has extensive
> tests.
I meant that, so far as I can see in
https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpituous/ , there are no tests
for the 'release' scripts. If there are, can you point me to them?
You are right. There are none on the cockpituous package.
regards,
Nikos