On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 19:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> writes:
> sounds like a perfectly good reason to file negative karma on the
> 'revised' update, then. Really - if you think the update is causing
> significant problems, file negative karma, raise a stink about it. We
> don't have to accept the update.
Done, but given that the glibc maintainers have already stated their
intention to walk away from that update and file a new one so they can
ignore the bad karma on it, I don't have a lot of faith that I wasn't
wasting my time.
to be fair, that was just to circumvent the bodhi issue I noted earlier.
I don't think they actually want to ignore negative feedback on the
*new* update, they just don't want negative feedback from the old update
considered as applying to the new one. Which is reasonable.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net