On 14. 03. 19 12:50, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 03. 19 12:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 10:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 14. 03. 19 7:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> [...]
>>> Maybe what we need is to have koji for example refusing epoch bumps
>>> (and thus failing the build) if _not bumping_ epoch would _not break_
>>> the upgrade path to ensure that epoch is only ever increased when we
>>> need to force a downgrade or when upstream changes versioning schemes
>>> in a way not considered an upgrade by RPM's NVR.
>>
>> Or use Pull Requests in the workflow and have somebody else review the
>> commit before it gets to Fedora?
>
> While that's a good idea in general, how do you propose to implement
> this for packages that have only a single maintainer?
Offer PR review swaps?
TBH I was mostly responding to the ceph package, where:
* there is more than 1 maintainer
* most of the commits are "dump hundreds of upstream changes here"
I'm concerned about this type of "maintenance". Giving the downstream spec
some
real love could have prevented this issue (it would not eliminate human error
entirely).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok