On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Michael Schwendt wrote:
My update packages for k3b are in need of further reviews according
to the fedora.us package submission and QA policies.
k3b 0.11.6 (one review)
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1106
k3b i18n 0.11
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1341
Alternatively, if someone likes to take over the packages (I'm not the
initial packager and have prepared the 0.9.x and 0.10.x updates only),
that would be appreciated, too, as I would add the required review.
My motivation to review and approve new packages has reached an all-time
low, when I see that the very few packages which I maintain or which I
have brought into shape during QA, don't seem to get published.
You're not alone in that. Looking at fedora-package-announce archives:
Month Published packages
March 2004: 2
February 2004: 14
January 2004: 20
December 2003: 34
November 2003: 64
That's a rather alarming trend :(
Meanwhile the QA-queue keeps growing and growing, it's up to 374 entries.
Now remember this :-P
http://www.fedora.us/pipermail/fedora-devel/2003-June/001535.html
How about a Fedora QA day? To
- get packages reviewed and published
- help new people get familiar with the process
- Panu -