On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:28:03PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
This should meet the signing requirements and it removes the opacity
without locking down any of Fedora. Such a bootloader should meet
whatever requirements to get signed, since if secureboot is turned on
it wont boot anything at all.
But you're happy to sacrifice the freedom for people to modify the error
text that's provided? What's your threshold?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org