On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:34:56PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:29:34PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > these are ALL wrong then with the 2.6 kernel and with the 2.6 rpms. Really.
> > Removing custom and all those hacks are *WRONG*. Even on 2.4.
> > Any kernel module that does that is *BROKEN* build wise. Extremely broken.
>
> Practice says otherwise. kernel module rpms for 2.4 and 2.6 are out
> there and are in use by several thousands of users without any
> problems regarding kernel infrastructure.
they are still broken and violating the rules.
Yes, but the users wouldn't see it like that.
And regarding kernels 2.4.x, I thought /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build was just a symbolic
link to /usr/src/linux-`uname -r`?
Regards,
Luciano Rocha
--
Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.