Am 25.05.2021 um 23:33 schrieb przemek klosowski via devel
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>:
On 5/25/21 5:04 PM, Peter Boy wrote:
>> So the same model works totally fine for both desktop and server.
>>
> I myself lack the exact technical knowledge, but (all?) server and file system
experts I hear consider just that a gross misconception.
>
I think you and Neal talk about two different things. The BTRFS proponents claim that the
subvolume technology allows you to have flexible partitioning, so that you can dynamically
create whatever partition layout is appropriate for your situation. Nobody is claiming
that desktop partition scheme ('model') should be forced onto servers.
Yes, you are right. It’s not about the konkrete partition scheme but the rationale behind
it. As a server admin, I'm all about stability, taking precautions in case of errors,
recovery, less about flexibility. On my workstation, flexibility is a high priority.