On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 01/10/2007, Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Jonathan Underwood (jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com) said:
> > Thoughts?
>
> As modules could be loaded at any time, it would seem the most
> correct way would be to do it via a modprobe.d or udev rule.
>
I see your point. But, taken to it's logical conclusion, we'd scrap sysctl.conf
completely.
Actually, that would be the right thing to do - it's currently a badly defined
ad hock kludge.
How many modules export sysctls instead of module parameters?
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com &
www.dell.com/linux