I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:16:42PM +0000, bugzilla(a)redhat.com wrote:
[...]
Summary: Introduce new systemd-rpm macros in watchdog spec
file
[...]
Fedora 18 changes the way how to work with services in spec files.
It
introduces new macros - %systemd_post, %systemd_preun and %systemd_postun;
which replace scriptlets from Fedora 17 and older (see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850016).
I'm not objecting to getting the bug being filed or to the packaging change.
However, the person who is sending these bugs reports is
(a) in a much better position to change the packages because they
understand the problem and the solution, and (b) ought to take on this
work because that's part of whatever feature/cleanup/etc they are
proposing, instead of pushing part of that work off to everyone else.
Therefore, I think a better Bugzilla message would have been:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fedora 18 changes the way how to work with services in spec files.
[etc as above]
If you would like to make this change to your own package, you
don't need to do anything now.
If you would like the reporter to fix your package, please add
a comment to this bug saying so within the next [2 weeks]. The
reporter will take care of this fix for you and unless there are
complications you won't need to do anything else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw