Am 27.01.2012 18:33, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
Ralf Corsepius (rc040203(a)freenet.de) said:
> On 01/27/2012 06:05 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger(a)gmail.com) said:
>>> Actually... we will "always" need the compat symlinks (for a finite
but
>>> definitely long value of "always"). Third party scripts, scripts
that have
>>> been in use on local systems, written by people who have long since passed
>>> on (to new jobs), people targetting FHS compliant systems (unless the FHS
>>> changes), etc will all depend on those symlinks being present. Even third
>>> party software that users want to compile and run may try to install into
>>> /bin, /sbin, and /lib so we may have that problem even there.
>>
>> And things like /bin/sh are compiled into glibc...
>
> And hard coded into 1000s of scripts and packages.
>
> I seriously think, Fedora has many urgent problems to address than
> the churn this "Feature" causes.
? There's no churn required due to packages having /bin/sh in them
if you finally want get rid of /bin it is
if you finally want have /bin as symlink forever this whole
change is only wasted time and makes no sense at all