On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 11:08 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
Matthias Saou wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote :
>
>
>>On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 15:21 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>>Alexander Larsson (alexl(a)redhat.com) said:
>>
>>>>I don't use bittorrent all that much. What do people think about
these
>>>>two frontends? Are there other interesting ones?
>>>
>>>I kept meaning to package gnome-bt for Extras, and kept forgetting.
>>>So that would be my preference. :)
>>
>>One issue with gnome-bt is that it depends on the bittorrent package,
>>and the bittorrent package already includes the default gui app, so
>>unless you do some creative packaging you would get two bittorrent UIs
>>with gnome-bt as the default.
>
>
> The current Extras bittorent package already splits the GUI into a
> sub-package called "bittorrent-gui", so as long as gnome-bt only requires
> what is contained in "bittorrent", it should work out fine.
Probably not actually. Extras has bittorrent 4.2.0 and gnome-bt doesn't
work with anything newer than 3.4.2; at least not last time I tried it.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1189957&...
I didn't really do much testing, but
http://people.redhat.com/alexl/files/gnome-bt-0.0.22-1.noarch.rpm
seemed to work fine with current bittorrent from extras.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl(a)redhat.com alla(a)lysator.liu.se
He's an ungodly chivalrous filmmaker plagued by the memory of his family's
brutal murder. She's a sharp-shooting tomboy stripper from aristocratic
European stock. They fight crime!