On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 19:44 +0200, Erwin Rol wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 07:21 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > One silly question, didn't rpm start using sqlite? But the databases
> > are still BDB?
>
> rpm defaults to bdb use. It _can_ use sqlite.
Is there any information on what the pros/cons are of both methods?
sqlite rpmdbs (for the current config) are about 3x slower, iirc.
-sv