2009/1/4 Tom Tromey <tromey(a)redhat.com>:
>>>>> "Chitlesh" == Chitlesh GOORAH
<chitlesh.goorah(a)gmail.com> writes:
Chitlesh> I have never used emacs before.
It is never too late :-)
Chitlesh>
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace.spec
I'm curious about the byte-compilation step in this spec file. Emacs
.elc files are not portable across Emacs versions; so won't this do
the wrong thing depending on the emacs alternatives setting? It seems
to me that either Emacs or XEmacs users will be left out.
An emacs-foo subpackages target GNU Emacs specifically, so that's ok.
Chitlesh could also create an xemacs subpackage if he chooses to.